FinTechCryptoReview Prompt

Compliance Prompt for GENIUS Act Stablecoin Screening

This Luna review prompt cross-references your active stablecoin wallet integration flows against the U.S. Treasury's GENIUS Act rules for permitted payment stablecoin issuers. It returns a control-by-control gap map, a sanctions screening coverage layout from signup to settlement, three prioritized remediation items, and a SAR readiness checklist. Built for compliance leads at fintech and crypto firms preparing for Treasury and FinCEN scrutiny.

How to use this prompt

1
Open Luna in the deepidv dashboard and paste the full prompt, or run it in Claude or ChatGPT if you are evaluating coverage outside the platform.
2
Replace the INPUT section with your wallet integration architecture, sanctions screening rule set, re-screening cadence, and the GENIUS Act sections your firm has already responded to.
3
Run the prompt and review the gap map first: every GENIUS Act control is rated covered, partial, or gap, with the evidence behind each rating.
4
Hand the three prioritized remediation items to your compliance and engineering owners, starting with anything rated blocking.
5
Re-run the prompt after each remediation sprint to confirm the gap map converges to full coverage before your next Treasury or FinCEN touchpoint.

The prompt

Luna, analyze our active wallet integration flow against the U.S. Treasury's newly issued GENIUS Act rules for Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers (PPSIs). Map our real-time user verification rules against standard BSA guidelines and output a compliance layout confirming continuous sanctions screening coverage.

INPUT, the user will paste:
- Active wallet integration architecture and verification touchpoints
- Existing sanctions screening rule set (OFAC, FATF, country watchlists)
- Re-screening cadence and on-chain risk score refresh window
- Current GENIUS Act sections the firm has formally responded to
- Any open Treasury or FinCEN advisories the firm is tracking

OUTPUT, return the following structured response:

1. GENIUS ACT GAP MAP
For each GENIUS Act control the rule set addresses:
- The control (one-sentence summary with the Treasury section reference)
- Current firm-level coverage (covered, partial, gap)
- Evidence of coverage, or the evidence-absence reason

2. SANCTIONS SCREENING COVERAGE LAYOUT
- Real-time screening path from user signup through ledger settlement
- Re-screening cadence at each touchpoint (signup, deposit, withdrawal, counterparty change)
- Watchlist sources currently wired and the refresh interval for each

3. THREE PRIORITIZED REMEDIATION ITEMS
For each item:
- The gap and its severity (blocking, high, medium)
- The proposed control and the system or agent that owns it
- Estimated time to deploy and the dependencies it touches

4. SAR AND ENFORCEMENT READINESS
- Evidence captured at alert time for a Treasury or FinCEN inquiry
- Audit trail requirements (cryptographic receipt, decision rationale, time-to-disposition)
- Workflow integration: how alerts route from Luna to the human investigation team

Be specific. Cite the Treasury rule references where you can. Where the firm's input is insufficient to assess a control, flag the question instead of guessing.

Test it in Claude or another LLM

This prompt is built for the Luna agent inside deepidv, where Luna maps a firm's live wallet verification rules against the U.S. Treasury's GENIUS Act rules for Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers and confirms continuous sanctions screening coverage. You can dry-run the same workflow in any general LLM first with fake architecture data to see the compliance layout before pointing it at real rule sets.

1
Paste the full prompt into Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini, but replace the opening direct address 'Luna,' with a role instruction such as 'Act as an AML and sanctions compliance analyst reviewing a stablecoin wallet integration against the GENIUS Act for Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers.'
2
Under the INPUT section, paste the synthetic sample data block below so the model has a wallet flow, a sanctions rule set, and a re-screening cadence to assess against.
3
Add one framing line so the model knows this is an evaluation pass: 'This is synthetic test data. Where a control cannot be assessed from the input, flag it as an open question instead of guessing.'
4
Check the output shape: you want a GENIUS Act gap map with covered/partial/gap calls and Treasury section references, a sanctions screening layout from signup through ledger settlement with per-touchpoint re-screening cadence, exactly three prioritized remediation items with severity, and a SAR/enforcement readiness section. If any section reads vague or invents a coverage claim the input did not support, tighten the prompt and re-run.
5
Once the output shape is right, run it live in the deepidv dashboard where Luna executes it against your real wallet integration, sanctions rule set, and on-chain risk scoring data.

Synthetic sample data to paste alongside the prompt

Fake test data, safe to share with any LLM. Swap in your own once the output looks right.

Wallet flow: signup KYC, deposit, withdrawal, counterparty change. Issuer: ACME-STABLE-TEST-001 (PPSI applicant).
Sanctions rule set: OFAC SDN at signup only; no FATF or country watchlist screening on deposits.
Re-screening cadence: signup screen once, no re-screen on withdrawal; on-chain risk score refreshes every 30 days.
Watchlist sources wired: OFAC SDN (refresh weekly). EU Consolidated and UN lists not wired.
GENIUS Act sections formally responded to: none yet.
Open advisory tracked: Treasury PPSI guidance, fake ref TREAS-TEST-2026-XX.

Pairs with on deepidv

Sources & further reading

FAQ

What does the GENIUS Act require for stablecoin sanctions screening?

The GENIUS Act establishes a federal framework for permitted payment stablecoin issuers, including BSA-style obligations such as customer verification and sanctions compliance. In practice that means continuous screening of wallets and counterparties against OFAC and related watchlists, not a one-time check at signup. This prompt maps your current screening coverage against those controls and flags the gaps with evidence.

Can I use this stablecoin compliance prompt outside the deepidv dashboard?

Yes. The prompt is written for Luna, the deepidv compliance agent, but the structure works in Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini as a self-assessment framework. You will get the gap map and remediation plan in any model; live evidence pulls and alert routing to your investigation team only work when it runs inside the deepidv dashboard.

Run it with live verification data

These prompts work in any LLM. Inside the deepidv dashboard, Luna, Arbiter, and Arc run them against your real sessions, screening lists, and audit trails.

Book a Demo